On Sun, Nov 30, 2025 at 11:51 AM Florian Fuchs <[email protected]> wrote: > > Use the napi functions napi_alloc_skb() and napi_gro_receive() instead > of netdev_alloc_skb() and netif_receive_skb() for more efficient packet > receiving. The switch to napi aware functions increases the RX > throughput, reduces the occurrence of retransmissions and improves the > resilience against SKB allocation failures. > > Signed-off-by: Florian Fuchs <[email protected]> > --- > Note: This change has been tested on real hardware Sony PS3 (CECHL04 PAL), > the patch was tested for many hours, with continuous system load, high > network transfer load and injected failslab errors. > > In my tests, the RX throughput increased up to 100% and reduced the > occurrence of retransmissions drastically, with GRO enabled: > > iperf3 before and after the commit, where PS3 (with this driver) is on > the receiving side: > Before: [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 551 MBytes 462 Mbits/sec receiver > After: [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 1.09 GBytes 939 Mbits/sec receiver > > stats from the sending client to the PS3: > Before: [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 552 MBytes 463 Mbits/sec 3151 sender > After: [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 1.09 GBytes 940 Mbits/sec 37 sender > > drivers/net/ethernet/toshiba/ps3_gelic_net.c | 15 ++++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Patch looks fine to me. My PS3 died years ago, so I can not test it :) Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]> BTW, I think we can cleanup gelic_descr_prepare_rx() a bit : diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/toshiba/ps3_gelic_net.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/toshiba/ps3_gelic_net.c index 5ee8e8980393c3491bf9cf91eb8e0dbb2df0f427..f4f34e9ed49c5b7fd1cf4ea3f5bfe7297e97ea23 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/toshiba/ps3_gelic_net.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/toshiba/ps3_gelic_net.c @@ -392,10 +392,8 @@ static int gelic_descr_prepare_rx(struct gelic_card *card, descr->hw_regs.payload.size = 0; descr->skb = netdev_alloc_skb(*card->netdev, rx_skb_size); - if (!descr->skb) { - descr->hw_regs.payload.dev_addr = 0; /* tell DMAC don't touch memory */ + if (!descr->skb) return -ENOMEM; - } offset = ((unsigned long)descr->skb->data) & (GELIC_NET_RXBUF_ALIGN - 1); @@ -404,13 +402,12 @@ static int gelic_descr_prepare_rx(struct gelic_card *card, /* io-mmu-map the skb */ cpu_addr = dma_map_single(ctodev(card), descr->skb->data, GELIC_NET_MAX_FRAME, DMA_FROM_DEVICE); - descr->hw_regs.payload.dev_addr = cpu_to_be32(cpu_addr); + if (dma_mapping_error(ctodev(card), cpu_addr)) { dev_kfree_skb_any(descr->skb); descr->skb = NULL; dev_info(ctodev(card), "%s:Could not iommu-map rx buffer\n", __func__); - gelic_descr_set_status(descr, GELIC_DESCR_DMA_NOT_IN_USE); return -ENOMEM; }
