On 20/01/2026 16:37, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 1/20/26 08:32, Ryan Roberts wrote: >> I don't think this question was really addressed to me, but I'll give my >> opinion >> anyway; I agree it's pretty binary - it will either work or it will explode. >> I've tested on arm64 and x86_64 so I have high confidence that it works. If >> you >> get it into -next ASAP it has 3 weeks to soak before the merge window opens >> right? (Linus said he would do an -rc8 this cycle). That feels like enough >> time >> to me. But it's your tree 😉 > > First of all, thank you for testing it on x86! Having that one data > point where it helped performance is super valuable. > > I'm more worried that it's going to regress performance somewhere and > then it's going to be a pain to back out. I'm not super worried about > functional regressions.
Fair enough. Let's go slow then.
