From: Abhishek Dubey <[email protected]>

Back propagation of tailcall count is no longer needed for
powerpc64 due to use of reference, which updates the tailcall
count in the tail_call_info field in the frame of the main
program only.

Back propagation is still required for 32-bit powerpc.

Signed-off-by: Abhishek Dubey <[email protected]>
---
 arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 13 +++++--------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 93355ba5382a..1a305f0fed27 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -662,14 +662,11 @@ static void bpf_trampoline_setup_tail_call_info(u32 
*image, struct codegen_conte
 static void bpf_trampoline_restore_tail_call_cnt(u32 *image, struct 
codegen_context *ctx,
                                                 int func_frame_offset, int 
r4_off)
 {
-       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC64)) {
-               /* See bpf_jit_stack_tailcallcnt() */
-               int tailcallcnt_offset = BPF_PPC_TAILCALL;
-
-               EMIT(PPC_RAW_LL(_R3, _R1, -tailcallcnt_offset));
-               EMIT(PPC_RAW_STL(_R3, _R1, func_frame_offset - 
tailcallcnt_offset));
-       } else {
-               /* See bpf_jit_stack_offsetof() and BPF_PPC_TC */
+       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC32)) {
+               /*
+                * Restore tailcall for 32-bit powerpc
+                * See bpf_jit_stack_offsetof() and BPF_PPC_TC
+                */
                EMIT(PPC_RAW_STL(_R4, _R1, r4_off));
        }
 }
-- 
2.48.1


Reply via email to