On Mon, Feb 09, 2026 at 12:52:26PM +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > On Mon, Feb 9, 2026 at 11:55 AM Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya (IBM) > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > diff --git a/rust/Makefile b/rust/Makefile > > index ae22f2c5f0b3..14febe9c7643 100644 > > --- a/rust/Makefile > > +++ b/rust/Makefile > > @@ -392,7 +392,15 @@ BINDGEN_TARGET_x86 := x86_64-linux-gnu > > BINDGEN_TARGET_arm64 := aarch64-linux-gnu > > BINDGEN_TARGET_arm := arm-linux-gnueabi > > BINDGEN_TARGET_loongarch := loongarch64-linux-gnusf > > + > > +ifdef CONFIG_PPC64 > > +ifdef CONFIG_CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN > > +BINDGEN_TARGET_powerpc := powerpc64le-linux-gnu > > +endif > > +else > > BINDGEN_TARGET_powerpc := powerpc-linux-gnu > > +endif > > + > > BINDGEN_TARGET_um := $(BINDGEN_TARGET_$(SUBARCH)) > > BINDGEN_TARGET := $(BINDGEN_TARGET_$(SRCARCH)) > > This looks reasonable. > > My only nit is that we could trigger an error in the nested if since > you wrote the if already. Otherwise, we could remove the nested one > until ppc64 is supported, or am I missing something? > I will remove the nested if till we have support for the ppc64 big endian.
Regards, Mukesh > Either way, for the Rust bits if powerpc maintainers are taking this: > > Acked-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]> > > Thanks! > > Cheers, > Miguel
