On Thu, Feb 12, 2026 at 06:09:58PM +0800, Jinjie Ruan wrote: > From: Sourabh Jain <[email protected]> > > During a memory hot-remove event, the elfcorehdr is rebuilt to exclude > the removed memory. While updating the crash memory ranges for this > operation, the crash memory ranges array can become unsorted. This > happens because remove_mem_range() may split a memory range into two > parts and append the higher-address part as a separate range at the end > of the array. > > So far, no issues have been observed due to the unsorted crash memory > ranges. However, this could lead to problems once crash memory range > removal is handled by generic code, as introduced in the upcoming > patches in this series. > > Currently, powerpc uses a platform-specific function, > remove_mem_range(), to exclude hot-removed memory from the crash memory > ranges. This function performs the same task as the generic > crash_exclude_mem_range() in crash_core.c. The generic helper also > ensures that the crash memory ranges remain sorted. So remove the > redundant powerpc-specific implementation and instead call > crash_exclude_mem_range_guarded() (which internally calls > crash_exclude_mem_range()) to exclude the hot-removed memory ranges. > > Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> > Cc: Baoquan he <[email protected]> > Cc: Jinjie Ruan <[email protected]> > Cc: Hari Bathini <[email protected]> > Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <[email protected]> > Cc: Mahesh Salgaonkar <[email protected]> > Cc: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> > Cc: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <[email protected]> > Cc: Shivang Upadhyay <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Signed-off-by: Sourabh Jain <[email protected]> > --- > arch/powerpc/include/asm/kexec_ranges.h | 4 +- > arch/powerpc/kexec/crash.c | 5 +- > arch/powerpc/kexec/ranges.c | 87 +------------------------ > 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)
This looks like a nice improvement! FWIW Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <[email protected]> -- Sincerely yours, Mike.
