On Fri, Mar 06, 2026 at 02:25:51PM +0100, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
> On 3/6/26 12:07, Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle) wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 06, 2026 at 11:15:57AM +0100, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
> >> In the past, only hugetlb had special "vma_kernel_pagesize()"
> >> requirements, so it provided its own implementation.
> >>
> >> In commit 05ea88608d4e ("mm, hugetlbfs: introduce ->pagesize() to
> >> vm_operations_struct") we generalized that approach by providing a
> >> vm_ops->pagesize() callback to be used by device-dax.
> >>
> >> Once device-dax started using that callback in commit c1d53b92b95c
> >> ("device-dax: implement ->pagesize() for smaps to report MMUPageSize")
> >> it was missed that CONFIG_DEV_DAX does not depend on hugetlb support.
> >>
> >> So building a kernel with CONFIG_DEV_DAX but without CONFIG_HUGETLBFS
> >> would not pick up that value.
> >>
> >> Fix it by moving vma_kernel_pagesize() to mm.h, providing only a single
> >> implementation. While at it, improve the kerneldoc a bit.
> >>
> >> Ideally, we'd move vma_mmu_pagesize() as well to the header. However,
> >> its __weak symbol might be overwritten by a PPC variant in hugetlb code.
> >> So let's leave it in there for now, as it really only matters for some
> >> hugetlb oddities.
> >>
> >> This was found by code inspection.
> >>
> >> Fixes: c1d53b92b95c ("device-dax: implement ->pagesize() for smaps to
> >> report MMUPageSize")
> >> Cc: Dan Williams <[email protected]>
> >> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <[email protected]>
> >
> > LGTM, but you need to fix up VMA tests, I attach a patch below to do this.
> > Will
> > this resolved:
>
> Thanks!
>
> I assume that should go into patch #2 instead?
(Sorry missed this on first reply)
It doesn't matter too much from compilation point of view but thought it made
more sense as this is where you pull vma_kernel_pagesize() in? But I'm fine with
either!
Cheers, Lorenzo
