Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello,
Wang Jian wrote:
+static void pata_platform_postreset(struct ata_link *link, unsigned int
*classes)
+{
+ struct ata_port *ap = link->ap;
+ struct ata_device *dev;
+ u8 select = ATA_DEVICE_OBS;
+
+ /* Call default callback first */
+ ata_sff_postreset(link, classes);
+
+ if (!(ap->flags & ATA_FLAG_8BIT_DATA))
+ return;
+
+ /* Set 8-bit mode. We know we can do that */
+ ata_link_for_each_dev(dev, link) {
+ if (dev->devno)
+ select |= ATA_DEV1;
+
+ iowrite8(SETFEATURES_8BIT_ON, ap->ioaddr.feature_addr);
+ iowrite8(select, ap->ioaddr.device_addr);
+ iowrite8(ATA_CMD_SET_FEATURES, ap->ioaddr.command_addr);
Aieee... Please don't do this. I think it best belongs to
ata_dev_configure() or ->dev_config() if you wanna put it in low level
driver.
Good.
I remember the spec states that this setfeature command should be issued
every time reset is issued. This is just a quick and safe hack.
I will look into libata deeper and figure out how to do it better per your
suggestion.
@@ -106,7 +159,8 @@ int __devinit __pata_platform_probe(struct device *dev,
struct resource *ctl_res,
struct resource *irq_res,
unsigned int ioport_shift,
- int __pio_mask)
+ int __pio_mask,
+ unsigned int data_width)
{
struct ata_host *host;
struct ata_port *ap;
@@ -140,6 +194,9 @@ int __devinit __pata_platform_probe(struct device *dev,
ap->pio_mask = __pio_mask;
ap->flags |= ATA_FLAG_SLAVE_POSS;
+ if (data_width == ATA_DATA_WIDTH_8BIT)
+ ap->flags |= ATA_FLAG_8BIT_DATA;
It's strange to define ATA_DATA_WIDTH_* constants in ata.h and only
use it in ata_platform.
I have expressed in another reply that the best place the code belongs to
should be decided first. The usage of flags looks ugly too :)
Overall, I think the bulk of the 8bit PIO implementation should go
into the libata core layer and transfer width should be property of
struct ata_device - probably right above or below pio/dma_mode and
xfer_mode/shift fields.
Yes, I agree it'd better go into libata core layer. But for transfer
width, I think it is not belongs to ata_device. It's about how ata
controller wired for data line. (In my case, it is how CF card wired).
Am I wrong?
Best regards
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
