On Tue, May 05, 2026 at 06:34:00PM +0200, Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) wrote:
> With userspace MD5:
>
> root@miae:~# time ./busybox md5sum avion.au
> 6513851d6109d42477b20cd56bf57f28 avion.au
> real 0m 2.38s
> user 0m 1.99s
> sys 0m 0.38s
Again, that's an unoptimized md5sum implementation, specifically
busybox's which is designed for size rather than speed. You'll just
need to replace it with a speed-optimized one, if that's what you need.
As I said, you can even reuse the same asm file, as it doesn't contain
any privileged instructions. However, there might be even faster code
out there (a GitHub search might be worthwhile). The code that's in the
kernel often isn't the fastest code that's available/possible.
> Now, we are talking about MD5 which is obsolete and being replaced in our
> systems by SHA256. So a commit message ressembling to the one in commit
> 23e5c306a207 ("lib/crypto: sparc: Drop optimized MD5 code") would be better
> as a justification for the removal.
Sure, I'll update the commit message to cover that too.
> By the way, what are your plans for SHA1 ? I think SHA1 should likely go
> away as well for the same reason.
Eventually the same thing will happen, but it will be some years in the
future.
- Eric
