On Tue, May 26, 2026 at 10:53 AM Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya <[email protected]> wrote: > > I wanted inline asm be stable, I was skeptical about inline asm to be > unstable and potentially messing up the whole system. That's the reason > I waited for the stable support to get merged before sending out this > patch series.
Yeah, sometimes unstable may mean there were remaining issues, but it is also common for features to remain unstable for a long time without no changes. So, yeah, we should at least try to know what is the overall status, i.e. the latest changes that landed regarding ppc64 inline asm, e.g. when was the last time a significant bug was fixed etc. (And I guess IBM prefers that it works with more versions rather than less?) > Yeah it may be true. I'll test out the 1.85 rustc and come back with the > results. Thanks, that would be great. > I am not aware of s390x way of approaching support for rust so can't say > anything about that. Ah, OK -- both series added the conditional to `scripts/min-tool-version.sh` and both are from IBM, so I was just wondering :) Cheers, Miguel
