On 5/25/2026 9:17 PM, Huacai Chen wrote:
> On Mon, May 25, 2026 at 7:37 PM Mike Rapoport <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Huacai,
>>
>> On Mon, May 25, 2026 at 06:14:52PM +0800, Huacai Chen wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 25, 2026 at 4:50 PM Jinjie Ruan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Jinjie Ruan (16):
>>>> riscv: kexec_file: Fix crashk_low_res not exclude bug
>>>> powerpc/crash: Fix possible memory leak in update_crash_elfcorehdr()
>>>> arm64: kexec: Fix image->elf_headers memory leak during retry loop
>>>> x86/kexec: Fix potential buffer overflow in prepare_elf_headers()
>>>> arm64: kexec_file: Fix potential buffer overflow in
>>>> prepare_elf_headers()
>>>> riscv: kexec_file: Fix potential buffer overflow in
>>>> prepare_elf_headers()
>>>> LoongArch: kexec: Fix potential buffer overflow in
>>>> prepare_elf_headers()
>>>> crash: Add crash_prepare_headers() to exclude crash kernel memory
>>>> arm64: kexec_file: Use crash_prepare_headers() helper to simplify code
>>>> x86/kexec: Use crash_prepare_headers() helper to simplify code
>>>> riscv: kexec_file: Use crash_prepare_headers() helper to simplify code
>>>> LoongArch: kexec: Use crash_prepare_headers() helper to simplify code
>>>> crash: Use crash_exclude_core_ranges() on powerpc
>>>> arm64: kexec: Add support for crashkernel CMA reservation
>>>> riscv: kexec: Add support for crashkernel CMA reservation
>>>> arm64/crash: Add crash hotplug support
>>> I have some bikesheedings about the subjects. Can we unify the prefix
>>> formats?
>>> x86/kexec, arm64: kexec_file, riscv: kexec_file, LoongArch: kexec .....
>>
>> It might look weird in the series, but powerpc and x86 use '/' and arm64 and
>> riscv use ':' so in the logs in arch/ this would be actually fine.
> OK, but at least we can unify kexec and kexec_file.
That looks fine.
Jinjie
>
> Huacai
>
>>
>> With the only exception of arm64/crash that should have been arm64: crash:
>>
>>> Huacai
>>
>> --
>> Sincerely yours,
>> Mike.
>
