Hi Amit,

Thanks for the patch. My review comments inline:

Amit Machhiwal <[email protected]> writes:

> Currently, when booting a compatibility-mode KVM guest (L1) on a PowerNV
> hypervisor (L0), the guest runs with the expected processor
> compatibility level. However, when booting a nested KVM guest (L2)
> inside the L1, QEMU derives the CPU model from the raw host PVR and
> attempts to run the nested guest at that level, instead of honoring the
> compatibility mode of the L1.
>
> Extend host CPU compatibility capability reporting to support nested
> virtualization on PowerNV systems (PAPR nested API v1).
>
> For nested API v2 (PowerVM), compatibility capabilities are obtained
> from the hypervisor via the H_GUEST_GET_CAPABILITIES hcall. This
> information is not available on PowerNV systems.
>
> For nested API v1, derive the compatibility capabilities from the L1
> guest by reading the "cpu-version" property from the device tree, which
> reflects the effective (logical) processor compatibility level. Map this
> value to the corresponding compatibility capability bitmap.
>
> Introduce a helper to translate CPU version values into compatibility
> capability bits and integrate it into kvmppc_get_compat_cpu_caps().
>
> This allows userspace to query host CPU compatibility modes on both
> PowerVM and PowerNV platforms via the KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS ioctl.
>
> Suggested-by: Vaibhav Jain <[email protected]>
> Tested-by: Anushree Mathur <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Machhiwal <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> index 38de7040e2b7..18774c49af85 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> @@ -6522,15 +6522,50 @@ static bool kvmppc_hash_v3_possible(void)
>       return true;
>  }
>  
> +static int kvmppc_map_compat_capabilities(const __be32 cpu_version,
> +                                   unsigned long *capabilities)
> +{
> +     switch (cpu_version) {
> +     case PVR_ARCH_31_P11:
> +             *capabilities |= H_GUEST_CAP_POWER11;
> +             break;
> +     case PVR_ARCH_31:
> +             *capabilities |= H_GUEST_CAP_POWER10;
> +             break;
> +     case PVR_ARCH_300:
> +             *capabilities |= H_GUEST_CAP_POWER9;
> +             break;
> +     default:
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +     }
> +
> +     return 0;
> +}
>  
>  static int kvmppc_get_compat_cpu_caps(struct kvm_ppc_compat_caps *host_caps)
>  {
> +     struct device_node *np;
>       unsigned long capabilities = 0;
> +     const __be32 *prop = NULL;
>       long rc = -EINVAL;
> +     u32 cpu_version;
>  
>       if (kvmhv_on_pseries()) {
> -             if (kvmhv_is_nestedv2())
> +             if (kvmhv_is_nestedv2()) {
>                       rc = plpar_guest_get_capabilities(0,
>       &capabilities);
Need to mask capabilities as mentioned in the review comments for
previous patch. I would suggest creating a helper that performs the
hcall and applies the mask which can then be used at
plpar_guest_get_capabilities() call sites.

> +             } else {
> +                     for_each_node_by_type(np, "cpu") {
> +                             prop = of_get_property(np, "cpu-version", NULL);
> +                             if (prop) {
> +                                     cpu_version = be32_to_cpup(prop);
> +                                     break;
> +                             }
> +                     }
> +                     if (!prop)
> +                             return -EINVAL;
> +                     rc = kvmppc_map_compat_capabilities(cpu_version,
> +                                                             &capabilities);
> +             }
>               host_caps->compat_capabilities = capabilities;
>       }
>  
> -- 
> 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)
>

-- 
Cheers
~ Vaibhav

Reply via email to