Hello,

On Tue, Jun 2, 2026 at 7:03 AM Rob Herring <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 02:13:53AM +0900, Sang-Heon Jeon wrote:
> > Since commit 064e32dc5b03 ("of: fdt: Honor CONFIG_CMDLINE* even
> > without /chosen node, take 2"), early_init_dt_scan_chosen() always
> > returns 0, so the return value checks at its callers have become
> > dead code.
> >
> > Drop the return value, change the function to return void, and
> > update its declaration and callers accordingly. No functional
> > change.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sang-Heon Jeon <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > dt-test result
> >
> > [    0.684136] ### dt-test ### start of unittest - you will see error 
> > messages
> > [    0.685849] ### dt-test ### EXPECT \ : Duplicate name in testcase-data, 
> > renamed to "duplicate-name#1"
> > [    0.685870] Duplicate name in testcase-data, renamed to 
> > "duplicate-name#1"
> > [    0.689496] ### dt-test ### EXPECT / : Duplicate name in testcase-data, 
> > renamed to "duplicate-name#1"
> >
> > ...
> >
> > [    1.693384] ### dt-test ### EXPECT / : OF: resolver: overlay phandle 
> > fixup failed: -22
> > [    1.693386] ### dt-test ### EXPECT / : OF: resolver: node label 
> > 'this_label_does_not_exist' not found in live devicetree symbols table
> > [    1.694968] ### dt-test ### end of unittest - 405 passed, 0 failed
> > ---
> >  drivers/of/fdt.c       | 10 ++--------
> >  include/linux/of_fdt.h |  2 +-
> >  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> Looks like this is dependent on patch 1, so I'm assuming the PPC folks
> will take the series.
>
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <[email protected]>

Thanks for reviewing, Rob :)

The merge window is now open. PPC folks, could you take a look and
pick this series up for 7.2?

Best Regards,
Sang-Heon Jeon

Reply via email to