> On 7 Jun 2026, at 7:32 PM, Athira Rajeev <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> In redhat perftool testsuite, observed fail for this test:
>    -- [ FAIL ] -- perf_sched :: test_timehist :: --with-summary (output 
> regexp parsing)
> 
> This led to analysis of "perf sched timehist" summary options.
> 
>  # perf sched record -a -o ./perf.data -- sleep 0.1
>   This will record using perf sched record
> 
> perf sched timeliest has two options "-s" and "-S"
>  # perf sched -i ./perf.data timehist -S
> -S : Captures summary also at the end
> 
>  # perf sched -i ./perf.data timehist -s
> -s : Captures only summary
> 
> The test saves -s result which has only summary and compares with
> summary which comes at the end from -S . Since there is a difference
> in these two, test fails.
> 
> Checking the behaviour change in -S and -s results, difference is:
> 
>                  rcu_sched[16]       2          4        0.013      0.001     
>   0.003       0.006   33.23       0
>               migration/11[73]       2          1        0.006      0.006     
>   0.006       0.006    0.00       0
>                migration/3[33]       2          1        0.006      0.006     
>   0.006       0.006    0.00       0
> -               :216753[216753]      -1          1        0.041      0.041    
>    0.041       0.041    0.00       0
> +                 sleep[216753]      -1          1        0.041      0.041    
>    0.041       0.041    0.00       0
>                migration/8[58]       2          1        0.005      0.005     
>   0.005       0.005    0.00       0
>            NetworkManager[811]       1          2        0.089      0.028     
>   0.044       0.060   36.06       0
>               migration/13[83]       2          1        0.005      0.005     
>   0.005       0.005    0.00       0
> 
> Here 216753 is pid for sleep which is a zombie process. This is
> happening in latest kernel due to an update in "-S" result.
> In -S, the process name appears in the results "sleep[216753]",
> where as in the -s, only pid is present in the summary result
> ":216753[216753]".
> 
> After commit 39f473f6d0b2 ("perf sched timehist: decode process names
> of processes in zombie state")
> for -S option, if process name is using pid, it uses different way to
> set it. So that we get the process name and not just Pid.
> 
> This change went in only for timehist_print_sample() function.
> Add this improvement in generic place so that even -s option (which
> captures summary) also will have meaningful information.
> 
> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
> Tested-by: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <[email protected]>
> ---
> Changelog
> v1 -> v2:
> - Rebased on top of latest perf-tools-next
> - Since there is no change in logic, carried Acked-by from
> Namhyung Kim and Tested-by from Venkat Rao Bagalkote
> 
> tools/perf/builtin-sched.c | 16 ++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Hi,

Looking for comments on this patch

Thanks
Athira
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c b/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c
> index b7ccdc6a985d..5d3761a27e67 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c
> @@ -2259,12 +2259,6 @@ static void timehist_print_sample(struct perf_sched 
> *sched,
> printf(" ");
> }
> 
> - if (!thread__comm_set(thread)) {
> - const char *prev_comm = perf_sample__strval(sample, "prev_comm");
> -
> - thread__set_comm(thread, prev_comm, sample->time);
> -        }
> -
> printf(" %-*s ", comm_width, timehist_get_commstr(thread));
> 
> if (sched->show_prio)
> @@ -2965,6 +2959,16 @@ static int timehist_sched_change_event(const struct 
> perf_tool *tool,
> thread__zput(itr->last_thread);
> }
> 
> + /*
> + * If the process name is not set for the thread, use "prev_comm"
> + * to set it. Otherwise the sched summary will have just pid information
> + */
> + if (!thread__comm_set(thread)) {
> + const char *prev_comm = perf_sample__strval(sample, "prev_comm");
> +
> + thread__set_comm(thread, prev_comm, sample->time);
> + }
> +
> if (!sched->summary_only)
> timehist_print_sample(sched, sample, &al, thread, t, state);
> }
> -- 
> 2.52.0
> 


Reply via email to