Hi Rusty,

Today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:

arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spu_base.c: In function 'mm_needs_global_tlbie':
arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spu_base.c:117: error: implicit declaration of 
function '__cpus_setall'

Caused by commit 20ec1a8465bd6d2e7e68fa5a7b09309c920b4792
("cpumask:add-struct-cpumask") which removed __cpus_setall from
include/linux/cpumask.h.

I applied the hack patch below (which is probably not what we want).
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

From: Stephen Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:36:21 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] powerpc/spu: cpumask updates fallout.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
 arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spu_base.c |    9 ++++++---
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spu_base.c 
b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spu_base.c
index a5bdb89..a876904 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spu_base.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spu_base.c
@@ -111,10 +111,13 @@ void spu_flush_all_slbs(struct mm_struct *mm)
  */
 static inline void mm_needs_global_tlbie(struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
-       int nr = (NR_CPUS > 1) ? NR_CPUS : NR_CPUS + 1;
-
        /* Global TLBIE broadcast required with SPEs. */
-       __cpus_setall(&mm->cpu_vm_mask, nr);
+       if (NR_CPUS > 1)
+               cpumask_setall(&mm->cpu_vm_mask);
+       else {
+               cpumask_set_cpu(0, &mm->cpu_vm_mask);
+               cpumask_set_cpu(1, &mm->cpu_vm_mask);
+       }
 }
 
 void spu_associate_mm(struct spu *spu, struct mm_struct *mm)
-- 
1.5.6.5

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to