On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 10:35:20PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
> I don't get what you are trying to say. CONFIG_EDAC_MPC85XX is
> enabled in the that config already.

You mean, *because* CONFIG_EDAC_MPC85XX is =y, then RAS=y? I guess that is
true for this particular config.

> It's just that the mentioned commit broke it because it removed the "select
> RAS", while EDAC depends on it.

No, that commit dropped a select statement which is good in its own right.

> Still, it's already enabled in that config and it somewhat recently
> got IMX9 support,

Who got IMX9 support?

> so I guess NXP is interested in keeping it.

I have not heard anything.

> That being said, I have the hardware, but right now I don't have
> much time personally. 

Welcome to the club. :-)

> The best I could do is "Odd Fixes". (I also have two pending patches for
> that edac driver, yet to be posted to the ML).

That driver is orphaned and no one maintains it now. You would be the only one
who is using it.

I can pick up well tested patches tho.

:-)


-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

Reply via email to