On Mon, Aug 3, 2026, at 11:59, Junrui Luo wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2026 at 11:28:46AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 2, 2026, at 17:51, Junrui Luo via B4 Relay wrote:
>> >
>> > Patches 1-5 are tagged for stable. 6/6 is deliberately not: it changes the
>> > atomicity of multi-element mailbox transfers rather than just adding a
>> > check, so it seems better to let it soak in mainline first.
>> >
>> > Build-tested only. I have no Cell or PS3 hardware, so none of this has
>> > been exercised at runtime.
>>
>> These are all reasonable fixes as far as I can tell, but I'm missing
>> information about why you care about spufs. If you used some atomated
>> tooling, please add some reference to what you used.
>
> We're working on a paper on LLM-assisted vulnerability research. spufs
> was just picked at random as one of the modules to look at. The tooling
> is an agent we developed ourselves. Should we add an Assisted-by tag in
> v2?
Yes, I think that would help.
Arnd
