On Mon, Aug 03, 2026 at 05:43:57PM +0100, Pedro Falcato wrote: > There is no need for write access to the PTE. > > Signed-off-by: Pedro Falcato <[email protected]>
With below addressed LGTM so: Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <[email protected]> > --- > arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/32/pte-8xx.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/32/pte-8xx.h > b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/32/pte-8xx.h > index e2ea8ba9f8ca..f2bab31040c7 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/32/pte-8xx.h > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/32/pte-8xx.h > @@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ static inline pte_basic_t pte_update(struct mm_struct > *mm, unsigned long addr, p > > #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_16K_PAGES > #define ptep_get ptep_get > -static inline pte_t ptep_get(pte_t *ptep) > +static inline pte_t ptep_get(const pte_t *ptep) > { > pte_basic_t val = READ_ONCE(ptep->pte); > pte_t pte = {val, val, val, val}; Worth making these const too (that {val, val, val, val} horrifies me btw :)? > -- > 2.55.0 > -- Cheers, Lorenzo
