On Tue, Aug 4, 2026 at 7:07 PM Ian Rogers <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 2, 2026 at 11:08 AM Tanushree Shah <[email protected]> wrote: ... > > v1: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/[email protected]/ > > Thanks again Tanushree for pursuing this. I see on sashiko.dev that > sashiko couldn't review the v2 patches because they failed to apply: > https://sashiko.dev/#/log/baseline/53604/2 > The SHA of perf-tools-next that sashiko.dev was trying was > d04ef71492fad7230d474efe33d05f4c0563d409, which corresponds to "perf > machine: Check snprintf truncation for guest kallsyms path," added 4 > days ago: > https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools-next.git/commit/?h=perf-tools-next&id=d04ef71492fad7230d474efe33d05f4c0563d409 > Could you rebase the patches so that we can benefit from the Sashiko review?
Fwiw, I went through the individual patches in case I could give some useful early feedback. Everything looks great, and thanks for adding the test! Thanks, Ian
