Hi, Jinjie,

Why does the ARM64 version of this patch use "kexec_file" in the
subject line but the LoongArch version uses "kexec"? It is better to
keep consistency.

Huacai

On Wed, Aug 26, 2026 at 5:25 PM Jinjie Ruan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> During kexec image placement retry loops, any midway failure causes
> the loader to truncate `image->nr_segments` back to its initial state
> to purge the failed segments.
>
> However, this truncation introduces a memory leak. The CMA pages
> allocated via kexec_add_buffer() during the failed attempt are tracked
> in the `image->segment_cma` array. Because the subsequent cleanup paths
> only iterate up to the truncated `nr_segments` boundary, these allocated
> CMA pages outside the new boundary are permanently leaked.
>
> Fix this by explicitly releasing the associated CMA buffers in
> the failure paths before `image->nr_segments` is reduced.
>
> Cc: Huacai Chen <[email protected]>
> Cc: WANG Xuerui <[email protected]>
> Cc: Youling Tang <[email protected]>
> Cc: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <[email protected]>
> Cc: Sourabh Jain <[email protected]>
> Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Link: 
> https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260729031235.2840255-1-ruanjinjie%40huawei.com
> Fixes: 55d990f0084c ("LoongArch: Add EFI binary support for kexec_file")
> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/loongarch/kernel/kexec_efi.c          | 1 +
>  arch/loongarch/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c | 6 +++++-
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/kexec_efi.c 
> b/arch/loongarch/kernel/kexec_efi.c
> index 5ee78ebb1546..15fd797ff3de 100644
> --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/kexec_efi.c
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/kexec_efi.c
> @@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ static void *efi_kexec_load(struct kimage *image,
>                  * We couldn't find space for the other segments; erase the
>                  * kernel segment and try the next available hole.
>                  */
> +               kexec_free_segment_cma(image, kernel_segment_number);
>                 image->nr_segments -= 1;
>                 kbuf.buf_min = kernel_segment->mem + kernel_segment->memsz;
>                 kbuf.mem = KEXEC_BUF_MEM_UNKNOWN;
> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c 
> b/arch/loongarch/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c
> index 5412aa9f3568..62a5be102065 100644
> --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c
> @@ -217,7 +217,11 @@ int load_other_segments(struct kimage *image,
>         return 0;
>
>  out_err:
> -       image->nr_segments = orig_segments;
> +       while (image->nr_segments > orig_segments) {
> +               kexec_free_segment_cma(image, image->nr_segments - 1);
> +               image->nr_segments--;
> +       }
> +
>         kfree(modified_cmdline);
>         return ret;
>  }
> --
> 2.34.1
>

Reply via email to