Move to using the same macro definition for _FP_CHOOSENAN as s390,
sh, sparc32/64. The original author didn't understand this and
matched what sparc64 was doing and they have updated to this definition.
Signed-off-by: Liu Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/sfp-machine.h | 26 +++++++++++++++++---------
1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/sfp-machine.h
b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/sfp-machine.h
index da12ea7..88af036 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/sfp-machine.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/sfp-machine.h
@@ -111,16 +111,24 @@
#define FP_EX_DIVZERO (1 << (31 - 5))
#define FP_EX_INEXACT (1 << (31 - 6))
-/* This macro appears to be called when both X and Y are NaNs, and
- * has to choose one and copy it to R. i386 goes for the larger of the
- * two, sparc64 just picks Y. I don't understand this at all so I'll
- * go with sparc64 because it's shorter :-> -- PMM
+/*
+ * If one NaN is signaling and the other is not,
+ * we choose that one, otherwise we choose X.
*/
-#define _FP_CHOOSENAN(fs, wc, R, X, Y, OP) \
- do { \
- R##_s = Y##_s; \
- _FP_FRAC_COPY_##wc(R,Y); \
- R##_c = FP_CLS_NAN; \
+#define _FP_CHOOSENAN(fs, wc, R, X, Y, OP) \
+ do { \
+ if ((_FP_FRAC_HIGH_RAW_##fs(Y) & _FP_QNANBIT_##fs) \
+ && !(_FP_FRAC_HIGH_RAW_##fs(X) & _FP_QNANBIT_##fs)) \
+ { \
+ R##_s = X##_s; \
+ _FP_FRAC_COPY_##wc(R,X); \
+ } \
+ else \
+ { \
+ R##_s = Y##_s; \
+ _FP_FRAC_COPY_##wc(R,Y); \
+ } \
+ R##_c = FP_CLS_NAN; \
} while (0)
--
1.5.4
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
