On Oct 27, 2008, at 10:16 PM, Paul Mackerras wrote:
Kumar Gala writes:
not that I have anything against this patch but is there anything we
can do about the CPU_FTR_ usage for one of things like this?
<blinks>
Can you express that a little more coherently for us, please? :)
I'm asking if we can come up with a better solution than using
CPU_FTR_ bits for extremely specific uses like this.
- k
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
