On Tuesday 04 November 2008, Ira Snyder wrote: > So, since interrupts are disabled while my interrupt handler is running, > I think I should be able to use spin_lock() and spin_unlock(), correct?
yes. > But sparse gives me the following warning: > wqt.c:185:9: warning: context imbalance in 'wqt_interrupt': wrong count at > exit > wqt.c:185:9: context 'lock': wanted 0, got 1 > > If I'm using spin_lock_irqsave() and spin_lock_irqrestore() I do not get > the same warnings. Therefore I must have some misunderstanding :) I've seen something like that before, I think it was a bug either in sparse or in the powerpc platform code. Try updating both the kernel and sparse and see if it still happens. Arnd <>< _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev