On Mon, Oct 26, 2026 at 02:24:58PM -0600, James Hilliard wrote: > On Mon, Oct 26, 2026 at 2:17 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2026 at 01:59:06PM -0600, James Hilliard wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2026 at 1:53 PM Andy Shevchenko > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2026 at 10:45:54AM -0600, James Hilliard wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2026 at 3:33 AM Andy Shevchenko > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Oct 25, 2026 at 04:11:08PM -0600, James Hilliard wrote: > > > > > > > On Sun, Oct 25, 2026 at 2:44 PM Andy Shevchenko > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sun, Oct 25, 2026 at 02:25:46PM -0600, James Hilliard wrote: > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > > > Some people might want to test the stuff. And sending too often > > > > > > > > you actually > > > > > > > > will get the opposite results, people will be tired to even > > > > > > > > start reviewing > > > > > > > > and/or testing your code as it's changed way too quickly. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My thought process was that people wouldn't want to be testing > > > > > > > code that > > > > > > > had known bugs flagged in Sashiko reviews. > > > > > > > > > > > > Sashiko reviews are not visible in my or any other mailbox. To see > > > > > > them I have > > > > > > to go to some URL and so on, meaning to waste time to see why on > > > > > > the earth the > > > > > > new version has been sent. > > > > > > > > > > Maybe the Sashiko reviews are getting caught in spam filtering or > > > > > something? > > > > > They are showing up for me and on the mailing list[0] so I'm a bit > > > > > confused why > > > > > you aren't seeing them. You shouldn't have to go to the web > > > > > interface[1] to look > > > > > up the reviews. > > > > > > > > > > [0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://sashiko.dev/ > > > > > > > > > > > It's better before addressing Sashiko comments, > > > > > > reply to all people involved and to Sashiko's original email, so it > > > > > > will be > > > > > > visible in the previous version why you issued (actually about to > > > > > > issue) the > > > > > > next version. > > > > > > > > > > Hmm, maybe it makes sense to enable recipients in the reply_to > > > > > config[2]? > > > > > > > > It's up to the list owners / subsystem maintainers. > > > > > > > > > [2] > > > > > https://github.com/sashiko-dev/sashiko/blob/v.0.6.3/projects/linux/mailing_lists.toml#L290 > > > > > > > > > > > And before even issuing it, wait for a while, people might > > > > > > disagree with Sashiko judgement or your replies on how to address > > > > > > that. > > > > > > > > > > I was assuming everyone was seeing the Sashiko reviews getting posted > > > > > to > > > > > the mailing list already. The are ending up in lore so unless someone > > > > > isn't > > > > > subscribed to the list I'm not sure why they wouldn't be seeing those > > > > > reviews > > > > > already. > > > > > > > > I assume you already answered your Q. mailing list in this sense > > > > doesn't mean > > > > recipients. I think it simply goes to the mailing list without > > > > forwarding. > > > > > > Do we want those reviews going to recipients as well as the mailing list? > > > > For serial patches, we decided to only have it go to the submitter and > > the list. > > When it goes to the list is it supposed to go to list subscribers as > well or only to lore?
All list subscribers as well, I've watched your interactions just fine :) thanks, greg k-h
