GUP rejects VM_IO and VM_PFNMAP mappings early. __access_remote_vm() then
falls back to vm_ops->access without checking VMA permissions and without
limiting the request to the VMA size.

Consequently, /proc/<pid>/mem can bypass protections even without
FOLL_FORCE, or cross into another mapping without checking its
permissions.

Check VMA permissions before calling ->access and limit each request to
the current VMA. Implement similar access permission checks as GUP,
however:
 (1) Reject writes to CoW mappings because the callbacks access backing
     memory directly and cannot handle CoW.
 (2) Allow forced writes to non-CoW mappings with VM_MAYWRITE.

This intentionally breaks forced writes through legacy amdgpu PROT_NONE,
MAP_PRIVATE debugger mappings. The workaround in commit fa5239f2af98
("drm/amdgpu: workaround failed COW checks for Thunk VMAs") cleared
VM_MAYWRITE to avoid CoW, but debugger writes still succeeded by
exploiting the missing access-permission checks fixed here. Reads remain
supported. Userspace must use MAP_SHARED instead; ROCm 5.5.0, released
in May 2023, already does so.

Link: 
https://github.com/ROCm/ROCT-Thunk-Interface/commit/fea44fab6e84eda52fcf6b419b35600c18f4c022
Fixes: 272ddc8b3735 ("proc: don't use FOLL_FORCE for reading cmdline and 
environment")
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: Felix Kuehling <[email protected]>
Cc: Christian König <[email protected]>
Cc: Simona Vetter <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Chris Mason <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <[email protected]>
---
 mm/memory.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index d4370c1b331c9..9872f289c1e49 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -7362,6 +7362,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(generic_access_phys);
 static int __access_remote_vm(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
                              void *buf, int len, unsigned int gup_flags)
 {
+       const bool force = gup_flags & FOLL_FORCE;
        void *old_buf = buf;
        int write = gup_flags & FOLL_WRITE;
 
@@ -7401,15 +7402,35 @@ static int __access_remote_vm(struct mm_struct *mm, 
unsigned long addr,
                        if (gup_flags & FOLL_ANON)
                                break;
 
+                       if (write) {
+                               if (!vma_test(vma, VMA_MAYWRITE_BIT))
+                                       break;
+                               if (!vma_test(vma, VMA_WRITE_BIT) && !force)
+                                       break;
+                               /*
+                                * In contrast to GUP, we historically allowed
+                                * FOLL_FORCE write access to non-CoW mappings.
+                                * However, we must always reject CoW mappings
+                                * as we cannot CoW here.
+                                */
+                               if (vma_is_cow_mapping(vma))
+                                       break;
+                       } else if (!vma_test(vma, VMA_READ_BIT)) {
+                               if (!force || !vma_test(vma, VMA_MAYREAD_BIT))
+                                       break;
+                       }
+
                        /*
                         * Check if this is a VM_IO | VM_PFNMAP VMA, which
                         * we can access using slightly different code.
                         */
                        bytes = 0;
 #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_IOREMAP_PROT
-                       if (vma->vm_ops && vma->vm_ops->access)
+                       if (vma->vm_ops && vma->vm_ops->access) {
+                               bytes = min_t(unsigned long, len, vma->vm_end - 
addr);
                                bytes = vma->vm_ops->access(vma, addr, buf,
-                                                           len, write);
+                                                           bytes, write);
+                       }
 #endif
                        if (bytes <= 0)
                                break;

-- 
2.43.0


Reply via email to