shca_list_lock is taken from softirq context in ehca_poll_eqs, so we need to
lock IRQ safe elsewhere.

Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Joachim Fenkes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---

On Friday 21 November 2008 17:02, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 16:37 +0100, Joachim Fenkes wrote:
> 
> > +   u64 flags;
> 
> > -   spin_lock(&shca_list_lock);
> > +   spin_lock_irqsave(&shca_list_lock, flags);
> 
> That's wrong and I think will give a warning on all machines where
> u64 != unsigned long. Might not particularly matter in this case.

Doesn't matter for a ppc64 only driver, but you're right nonetheless. Thanks.
 
> Also, generally it seems wrong to say "fix lockdep failure" when the
> patch really fixes a bug that lockdep happened to find.

Whatever -- changed.

Here's the updated patch.

Regards,
  Joachim


 drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_main.c |   17 ++++++++++-------
 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_main.c 
b/drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_main.c
index bb02a86..169aa1a 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_main.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_main.c
@@ -717,6 +717,7 @@ static int __devinit ehca_probe(struct of_device *dev,
        const u64 *handle;
        struct ib_pd *ibpd;
        int ret, i, eq_size;
+       unsigned long flags;
 
        handle = of_get_property(dev->node, "ibm,hca-handle", NULL);
        if (!handle) {
@@ -830,9 +831,9 @@ static int __devinit ehca_probe(struct of_device *dev,
                ehca_err(&shca->ib_device,
                         "Cannot create device attributes  ret=%d", ret);
 
-       spin_lock(&shca_list_lock);
+       spin_lock_irqsave(&shca_list_lock, flags);
        list_add(&shca->shca_list, &shca_list);
-       spin_unlock(&shca_list_lock);
+       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&shca_list_lock, flags);
 
        return 0;
 
@@ -878,6 +879,7 @@ probe1:
 static int __devexit ehca_remove(struct of_device *dev)
 {
        struct ehca_shca *shca = dev->dev.driver_data;
+       unsigned long flags;
        int ret;
 
        sysfs_remove_group(&dev->dev.kobj, &ehca_dev_attr_grp);
@@ -915,9 +917,9 @@ static int __devexit ehca_remove(struct of_device *dev)
 
        ib_dealloc_device(&shca->ib_device);
 
-       spin_lock(&shca_list_lock);
+       spin_lock_irqsave(&shca_list_lock, flags);
        list_del(&shca->shca_list);
-       spin_unlock(&shca_list_lock);
+       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&shca_list_lock, flags);
 
        return ret;
 }
@@ -975,6 +977,7 @@ static int ehca_mem_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
                             unsigned long action, void *data)
 {
        static unsigned long ehca_dmem_warn_time;
+       unsigned long flags;
 
        switch (action) {
        case MEM_CANCEL_OFFLINE:
@@ -985,12 +988,12 @@ static int ehca_mem_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
        case MEM_GOING_ONLINE:
        case MEM_GOING_OFFLINE:
                /* only ok if no hca is attached to the lpar */
-               spin_lock(&shca_list_lock);
+               spin_lock_irqsave(&shca_list_lock, flags);
                if (list_empty(&shca_list)) {
-                       spin_unlock(&shca_list_lock);
+                       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&shca_list_lock, flags);
                        return NOTIFY_OK;
                } else {
-                       spin_unlock(&shca_list_lock);
+                       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&shca_list_lock, flags);
                        if (printk_timed_ratelimit(&ehca_dmem_warn_time,
                                                   30 * 1000))
                                ehca_gen_err("DMEM operations are not allowed"
-- 
1.5.5



_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to