> Also, I don't see why those changes have anything to do with "unsigned > things cannot be negative". As long as those counts are never zero on > entry to those code sections, the existing code is fine, and I believe > that assertion can be maintained. If you believe the code needs to > defend against the possibility of a zero count on entry, that should > have been explicitly stated in the patch description.
See the tty_port patches in -next - this is an argument about code which ought eventually to go away replaced by standard helper functions. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
