On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 15:09 -0800, Trent Piepho wrote: > #ifdef __powerpc64__ > #define LONG_ASM_CONST(x) ASM_CONST(x) > #else > #define LONG_ASM_CONST(x) 0 > #endif > > #define CPU_FTR_NOEXECUTE LONG_ASM_CONST(0x0000000800000000) > > Am I not looking at the right code? Since e200 and e500 aren't powerpc64, > doesn't adding CPU_FTR_NOEXECUTE have no effect at all?
No, you are right, this is a case where I didn't actually verify that the patch had the expected effect :-( We are running out of low FTR bits, heck, I might make them 64-bit for everybody soon. I'll fix that up, thanks for spotting it. Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev