On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote: > On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 09:41 -0700, Grant Likely wrote: >> For the flattened device tree, I think we've settled on the convention >> that every node with an IRQ connection should have both the >> interrupt-parent and interrupts properties. (ie. don't rely on the >> parent node's interrupt-parent property.) > > Ah ? I use the trick of relying on the parent node regulary :-) Where > did we discuss that ?
It is also entirely possible that I'm smoking something exotic. g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
