On Thursday 12 March 2009, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 09:05 +0100, Stefan Roese wrote: > > Both is possible. Older U-Boot versions only passed the bd_t struct to > > the kernel. For those U-Boot's the wrapper is needed. More recent U-Boot > > versions support passing a device-tree blob to the kernel. U-Boot patches > > the correct memory size in this blob. > > > > As a matter of fact, I never used the wrapper before. U-Boot supports > > passing the device-tree blob to Linux since quite some time now. > > Yes, that's also how I use it on canyonlands... now, the wrapper could > probably be used to look at the bd_t anyways, no ?
Sure. > Either get the mem > size from there or some flag or version in there can indicate if it's > been "fixed". I don't think that we have some flag and/or version information in the bd_info struct. And extending this struct doesn't sound like a good idea to me. Best regards, Stefan _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
