On Tue, 7 Apr 2009, Michael Neuling wrote: > In message <alpine.lrh.2.00.0904061430090.11...@vixen.sonytel.be> you wrote: > > On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Kumar Gala wrote: > > > On Apr 3, 2009, at 7:08 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > >Finally (after ca. 1.5 years), he're an updated version of my patch to k= > > eep > > > >track of emulated instructions. In the light of Kumar's `Emulate enough= > > of > > > >SPE > > > >instructions to make gcc happy' patch, he probably also wants to keep tr= > > ack > > > >of > > > >the actual runtime overhead. > > > > > > > >Changes since last version: > > > > - arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c is now compiled on ppc32, so we can provi= > > de > > > > counters in sysfs on ppc32, too, > > > > - WARN_EMULATED() is a no-op if CONFIG_SYSCTL is disabled, > > > > - Add warnings for altivec, > > > > - Add warnings for recently introduced emulation of vsx and isel > > > > instructions. > > > = > > > > > pretty cool. Do we think counters should be sysfs or debugfs? > > > > What do you prefer? > > > > On MIPS, unaligned exception handling control is in debugfs. > > Would per process counters be too hard? Stick them in the thread_struct > and export them via /proc/<pid>/emulated.
But they go away as soon as the process exits, right? With kind regards, Geert Uytterhoeven Software Architect Sony Techsoft Centre Europe The Corporate Village · Da Vincilaan 7-D1 · B-1935 Zaventem · Belgium Phone: +32 (0)2 700 8453 Fax: +32 (0)2 700 8622 E-mail: geert.uytterhoe...@sonycom.com Internet: http://www.sony-europe.com/ A division of Sony Europe (Belgium) N.V. VAT BE 0413.825.160 · RPR Brussels Fortis · BIC GEBABEBB · IBAN BE41293037680010 _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
