On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:22:48PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Apr 15, 2009, at 11:50 AM, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > >> >> Sorry for bringing this up again... But can we decide on soc's >> compatible scheme and finally remove the device_type = "soc" >> for new boards? "fsl,p2020-soc", "fsl,soc", "simple-bus" maybe? >> >> Thanks, > > We can, but I don't want to couple the two issues. If someone wants to > work and post patches related to this issue I'm all for it.
I posted it in 2008: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg14311.html Do we agree on "fsl,<cpu>-{immr,ccsr}", "fsl,{immr,ccsr}", "fsl,soc", "simple-bus"? IIRC you didn't like "fsl,soc" in general and asked for more discussion: http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2008-January/050753.html And from time to time I'm just trying to provoke this discussion. -- Anton Vorontsov email: [email protected] irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2 _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
