Scott Wood wrote: > I thought the driver only used the bit if the device tree indicated it > was an 83xx-era DMA controller?
I just wanted to make sure it didn't do anything weird. It was the only test I could think of that didn't involve PCI. > That said, the bits are documented as specifically for PCI, so it would > be surprising if it had any effect elsewhere. Surely you wouldn't really be surprised by incorrect documentation of our parts. :-) -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev