Hello Christopher,

Varlese, Christopher wrote:
> (FYI I working on the kmeter1)
> 
> kmeter1.c reuses the same QE_ENET10 RGMII errata workaround code from 
> mpc836x_mds.c (MPC8360EMDS eval board).
> 
> In my view errata nodes in the dts is overkill.   Maybe the errata code can 
> go into a reusable function somewhere in 83xx/ or in ucc_geth.c?

To put an errata node in the dts was just an idea ;-)
I also mentioned putting this code in the ucc_geth.c driver ...

> I also think the original errata code needs improving:
>       - mask some SVR bits so activated for all matching CPU models, e.g. 
> MPC8360 & MPC8360E.

Did a first try in my v2 patch, see:

http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2009-April/071384.html

but I got no response yet.

>       - The code in mpc836x_mds.c and kmeter1.c does not do exactly what 
> Freescale errata says!

:-(

> Here the errata document:
>       http://www.freescale.com/files/32bit/doc/errata/MPC8360ECE.pdf
> 
> Because kmeter1 is using an MPC8360 CPU model the workaround doesn't actually 
> trigger.  So to kill 2 birds with 1 stone we tested a Uboot patch (below) 
> doing what QE_ENET10 says.   It seemed to work fine for us.
>         /* RGMII timing Errata workaround for rev 2.1 silicon
>          * (ref: MPC8360ECE rev.1 12/2007 QE_ENET10 UCC2 option 1)
>          */
>         void *reg = (void *)(CONFIG_SYS_IMMR + 0x14ac);
>         clrsetbits_be32 (reg, 0x000000F0, 0x000000A0);
> 
>>From my point of view:
>       - The workaround code in kmeter1.c could go for now.
>       - An improved errata workaround for 836x boards would be nice (..who is 
> motivated? :-))

I can make this errata, if someone gives advice, where to put ...
I vote for putting it into the ucc_geth.c driver, and activating it
maybe through the "phy-connection-type" if it activates the rgmii
mode ... ?

bye
Heiko
-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to