On Jul 9, 2009, at 2:35 PM, Ira W. Snyder wrote:
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 01:25:43PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Jul 9, 2009, at 1:17 PM, Ira W. Snyder wrote:
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 12:58:53PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
Hello Kumar,
I must not understand something going on here. Your proposed code
doesn't work at all on my board. The
/sys/devices/system/edac/mc/mc0/size_mb doesn't come out
correctly.
What does it come out as? How much memory do you have in the
system?
The size_mb shows as 0 with your code. See the explanation below.
With
my code it shows as 256MB, as expected.
I have 256MB memory in the system.
The attached patch DOES work on my board, but I'm confident that
it
does
NOT work on a system with PAGE_SIZE != 4096. Any idea what I did
wrong?
If I'm reading things correctly:
csrow->first_page full address of the first page (NOT pfn)
csrow->last_page full address of the last page (NOT pfn)
csrow->nr_pages number of pages
The EDAC subsystem does csrow->nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE to get the
size_mb
sysfs value.
If csrow->first_page and csrow->last_page ARE supposed to be the
pfn,
then I think the original code got it wrong, and the calculation
for
csrow->nr_pages needs to be changed.
Thanks,
Ira
[snip]
/************************ MC SYSFS parts
***********************************/
@@ -790,18 +792,19 @@ static void __devinit
mpc85xx_init_csrows(struct
mem_ctl_info *mci)
csrow = &mci->csrows[index];
cs_bnds = in_be32(pdata->mc_vbase + MPC85XX_MC_CS_BNDS_0 +
(index * MPC85XX_MC_CS_BNDS_OFS));
- start = (cs_bnds & 0xfff0000) << 4;
- end = ((cs_bnds & 0xfff) << 20);
- if (start)
- start |= 0xfffff;
- if (end)
- end |= 0xfffff;
can you printk what cs_bnds values are in your setup.
I am only using a single chip select. CS0_BNDS (register 0xe0002000)
is
0x0000000F.
+
+ start = (cs_bnds & 0xffff0000) >> 16;
+ end = (cs_bnds & 0x0000ffff);
This is the same in both our versions.
start == 0x0
end == 0xF
if (start == end)
continue; /* not populated */
- csrow->first_page = start >> PAGE_SHIFT;
- csrow->last_page = end >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+ start <<= PAGE_SHIFT;
+ end <<= PAGE_SHIFT;
+ end |= (1 << PAGE_SHIFT) - 1;
+
MY VERSION
start == 0x0
end == 0xffff
first_page == 0x0
last_page == 0xffff
YOUR VERSION (<<= (20 - PAGE_SHIFT), etc.)
My math was wrong it should be ( <<= (24 - PAGE_SHIFT) )
With that I think things work out.
Yep, that works out great. This solution is much better than my
original
code. The 83xx doesn't need to be special-cased anymore.
I checked the math for a 85xx with 64GB of memory. Assuming it uses
64K
pages (PAGE_SHIFT == 16), then everything works out.
Does the math work for a 64GB system w/4K pages?
- k
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
