On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 05:20 +0100, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:02:00 +0100 > Ian Campbell <ian.campb...@citrix.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 14:35 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > > I don't think that we need to take account of dom0 support; we don't > > > have a clear idea about an acceptable dom0 design (it needs to use > > > swiotlb code? I don't know yet), we don't even know we will have dom0 > > > support in mainline. That's why I didn't CC this patchset to Xen > > > camp. > > > > The core domain 0 patches which were the subject of the discussions a > > few week back are completely orthogonal to the swiotlb side of things > > ? If we don't merge dom0 patch, we don't need dom0 changes to > swiotlb. We don't know we would have dom0 support in mainline. Or I > overlooked something? [...] > As far as I know, you have not posted anything about changes to > swiotlb for domU. I can't discuss it. If you want, please send > patches.
There are no separate domU swiotlb patches -- the exact the same patches as we have already been discussing are useful and necessary for both domU and dom0. Ian. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
