On Jul 23, 2009, at 5:12 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 10:55 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Jul 23, 2009, at 12:59 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
This adds the opcode definitions to ppc-opcode.h for the two
instructions
tlbivax and tlbsrx. as defined by Book3E 2.06
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
Do we really have binutils that don't have tlbivax properly at this
point?
I don't know for sure, I like being consistent with the rest though
and so I use those macros for all those MMU opcodes. Also means that
I have no problem building with my current toolchain without passing
a specific -mcpu option or anything like that :-)
We can change that back later if you want.
ok, just wondering.. at some point we should decide which way we want
to go, since we use "tlbivax" today on e500/fsl-booke.
- k
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
