On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 22:54 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 08:23:05AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > >On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 00:15 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > > >> > c000000000600000 00001010 .long 0x1010 > >> > 0:mon> > >> > c000000000600004 00000008 .long 0x8 > >> > c000000000600008 00001013 .long 0x1013 > >> > c00000000060000c 0000000f .long 0xf > >> > c000000000600010 7961626f rldimi. r1,r11,44,41 > >> > c000000000600014 6f740000 xoris r20,r27,0 > >> > c000000000600018 00101600 .long 0x101600 > >> > c00000000060001c 00000c00 .long 0xc00 > >> > c000000000600020 00000400 .long 0x400 > >> > c000000000600024 00101100 .long 0x101100 > >> > c000000000600028 000008e9 .long 0x8e9 > > > >BTW. Corruption looks like bi_recs... ie, broken yaboot. This was fixed > >recently, yaboot would eventually crap over the kernel for certain sizes > >of the kernel image. > > > >0x1010 = BI_FIRST > >0x1013 = BI_BOOTLOADER_ID followed by 0x7961626f6f74 which is > >"yaboot" :-) > >0x1016 = BI_MACHTYPE > > I know we fixed it in Fedora for F11/F12. Did it get fixed upstream?
I think Tony did yes. Not sure what's the status with the "enterprise" distros. Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
