On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 07:46:28AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: >On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 12:07 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: >> >> Olof pointed out that we could probably do the iccci before the icbi loop and >> just skip that loop entirely on 44x. This is most certainly valid, but at >> this particular moment I don't have time to try and reproduce the issue with >> an alternative fix and I wanted to get _something_ out there to fix the >> issue. >> >> I suck for that, I know. > >Well, I can massage your patch if you want. The fact is, the icbi loop >and iccci are definitely redundant :-)
You can if you'd like. My biggest concern is getting time to recreate. I think I'll have time later in the week if you'd like to wait until then. I simply didn't want to send out a patch that I wasn't sure fixed the issue. josh _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
