On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 17:02 +0530, Arun R Bharadwaj wrote: > * Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijls...@chello.nl> [2009-08-26 13:27:18]: > > > On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 16:40 +0530, Arun R Bharadwaj wrote: > > > +void (*pm_idle)(void); > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_idle); > > > > Seriously.. this caused plenty problems over on x86 and you're doing the > > exact same dumb thing? > > > > Hi Peter, > > Cpuidle assumes pm_idle to be the default idle power management > function. So i should either do this, or change the stuff in cpuidle.c > so that it is more abstract.
I would much prefer the latter, I've been telling the x86 power folks to fix this like forever, but they never seem to get around to it. They even tried adding a second such unmanaged function pointer for play-dead, instead of integrating everything into a single management interface. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
