On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 15:30 -0400, Adam Zilkie wrote:
> All,
>
> We have found that using flush_dcache_range() after each DMA solves the
> problem. Ideally, we'd like to be able to allocate the virtual page in
> cache inhibited memory to avoid the performance loss from all the flush
> calls. To do this, we'd have to change our TLB sizes and reserve a TLB
> in memory as cache inhibited (using the 'I' bit). Will update if this
> works as well. Thanks for your help in this.
I think the problem is that you are manipulating the TLB directly, which
you shouldn't have to do. You also shouldn't have to use
flush_dcache_range() yourself neither.
It should all be handled by the DMA and PCI DMA APIs, you are just not
using those correctly.
You have two choice. You can either allocate memory permanently mapped
with I=1, in which case, use pci_alloc_consistent() (or
dma_alloc_coherent(), same thing).
Or you can use "normal" memory and ensure you flush/invalidate the cache
at the right time, which you can do with something like
pci_map_sg/pci_unmap_sg (or dma_* variants) or the dma_sync_* functions.
It's all pretty standard mechanisms in Linux, other platforms also have
non-coherent DMA (such as some ARMs) and those functions are generic.
Cheers,
Ben.
> Regards,
> Adam
>
> On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 11:59 -0700, Prodyut Hazarika wrote:
> > Hi Adam,
> >
> > > Yes, I am using the 440EPx (same as the sequoia board).
> > > Our ideDriver is DMA'ing blocks of 192-byte data over the PCI bus
> > (using
> > > the Sil0680A PCI-IDE bridge). Most of the DMA's (depending on timing)
> > > end up being partially corrupted when we try to parse the data in the
> > > virtual page. We have confirmed the data is good before the PCI-IDE
> > > bridge. We are creating two 8K pages and map them to physical DMA
> > memory
> > > using single-entry scatter/gather structs. When a DMA block is
> > > corrupted, we see a random portion of it (always a multiple of 16byte
> > > cache lines) is overwritten with old data from the last time the
> > buffer
> > > was used.
> >
> > This looks like a cache coherency problem.
> > Can you ensure that the TLB entries corresponding to the DMA region has
> > the CacheInhibit bit set.
> > You will need a BDI connected to your system.
> >
> > Also, you will need to invalidate and flush the lines appropriately,
> > since in 440 cores,
> > L1Cache coherency is managed entirely by software.
> > Please look at drivers/net/ibm_newemac/mal.c and core.c for example on
> > how to do it.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Prodyut
> >
> > On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 13:27 -0700, Prodyut Hazarika wrote:
> > > Hi Adam,
> > >
> > > > Are you sure there is L2 cache on the 440?
> > >
> > > It depends on the SoC you are using. SoC like 460EX (Canyonlands
> > board)
> > > have L2Cache.
> > > It seems you are using a Sequoia board, which has a 440EPx SoC. 440EPx
> > > has a 440 cpu core, but no L2Cache.
> > > Could you please tell me which SoC you are using?
> > > You can also refer to the appropriate dts file to see if there is L2C.
> > > For example, in canyonlands.dts (460EX based board), we have the L2C
> > > entry.
> > > L2C0: l2c {
> > > ...
> > > }
> > >
> > > >I am seeing this problem with our custom IDE driver which is based on
> >
> > > >pretty old code. Our driver uses pci_alloc_consistent() to allocate
> > the
> > >
> > > >physical DMA memory and alloc_pages() to allocate a virtual page. It
> > > >then uses pci_map_sg() to map to a scatter/gather buffer. Perhaps I
> > > >should convert these to the DMA API calls as you suggest.
> > >
> > > Could you give more details on the consistency problem? It is a good
> > > idea to change to the new DMA APIs, but pci_alloc_consistent() should
> > > work too
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Prodyut
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 19:57 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 09:05 +0100, Chris Pringle wrote:
> > > > > Hi Adam,
> > > > >
> > > > > If you have a look in include/asm-ppc/pgtable.h for the following
> > > section:
> > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_44x
> > > > > #define _PAGE_BASE (_PAGE_PRESENT | _PAGE_ACCESSED |
> > > _PAGE_GUARDED)
> > > > > #else
> > > > > #define _PAGE_BASE (_PAGE_PRESENT | _PAGE_ACCESSED)
> > > > > #endif
> > > > >
> > > > > Try adding _PAGE_COHERENT to the appropriate line above and see if
> > > that
> > > > > fixes your issue - this causes the 'M' bit to be set on the page
> > > which
> > > > > sure enforce cache coherency. If it doesn't, you'll need to check
> > > the
> > > > > 'M' bit isn't being masked out in head_44x.S (it was originally
> > > masked
> > > > > out on arch/powerpc, but was fixed in later kernels when the cache
> >
> > > > > coherency issues with non-SMP systems were resolved).
> > > >
> > > > I have some doubts about the usefulness of doing that for 4xx.
> > AFAIK,
> > > > the 440 core just ignores M.
> > > >
> > > > The problem lies probably elsewhere. Maybe the L2 cache coherency
> > > isn't
> > > > enabled or not working ?
> > > >
> > > > The L1 cache on 440 is simply not coherent, so drivers have to make
> > > sure
> > > > they use the appropriate DMA APIs which will do cache flushing when
> > > > needed.
> > > >
> > > > Adam, what driver is causing you that sort of problems ?
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Ben.
> > > >
> > > >
> > --
> > Adam Zilkie
> > Software Designer,
> > International Datacasting Corp.
> >
> > This message and the documents attached hereto are intended only for the
> > addressee and may contain privileged or confidential information. Any
> > unauthorized disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received
> > this message in error, please notify us immediately so that we may
> > correct our internal records. Please then delete the original message.
> > Thank you.
> > --------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is
> > for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and contains information that
> > is confidential and proprietary to AppliedMicro Corporation or its
> > subsidiaries. It is to be used solely for the purpose of furthering the
> > parties' business relationship. All unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
> > distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
> > contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
> > message.
> >
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
