On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 7:22 AM, Wolfram Sang <w.s...@pengutronix.de> wrote: >> Sure I don't have major objections against your patch (though who is >> formally mpc512x maintainer to ack it ?), > > Grant is maintainer for MPC5xxx.
Is this patch intended for mainline? I've received so many 5121 patches that only apply against a Denx tree that I'm starting to ignore them. Until the bulk of the out-of-tree 5121 support is merged, it would be helpful to specifically mention in the patch description whether or not it should be merged upstream. Cheers, g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev