On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 7:22 AM, Wolfram Sang <w.s...@pengutronix.de> wrote:
>> Sure I don't have major objections against your patch (though who is
>> formally mpc512x maintainer to ack it ?),
>
> Grant is maintainer for MPC5xxx.

Is this patch intended for mainline?  I've received so many 5121
patches that only apply against a Denx tree that I'm starting to
ignore them.  Until the bulk of the out-of-tree 5121 support is
merged, it would be helpful to specifically mention in the patch
description whether or not it should be merged upstream.

Cheers,
g.

-- 
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to