On Thursday 19 November 2009, Alon Ziv wrote:
> Is the following better?
>
> ---
> [PATCH] Xilinx 16550 UART is actually 16550A-compatible
>
Yes, that's better because it's guaranteed not to break any
other system, while fixing yours.
I'd still add support for the compatible="ns16550a" property
so that we do the right thing for future systems.
Arnd <><
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
