A cell is firmly established as a u32.  No need to do an ugly typedef
to redefine it to cell_t.  Eliminate the unnecessary typedef so that
it doesn't have to be added to the of_fdt header file

Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.lik...@secretlab.ca>
---

 arch/microblaze/kernel/prom.c |   10 ++++------
 arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c    |   14 ++++++--------
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/microblaze/kernel/prom.c b/arch/microblaze/kernel/prom.c
index e0f4c34..7760186 100644
--- a/arch/microblaze/kernel/prom.c
+++ b/arch/microblaze/kernel/prom.c
@@ -42,8 +42,6 @@
 #include <asm/sections.h>
 #include <asm/pci-bridge.h>
 
-typedef u32 cell_t;
-
 /* export that to outside world */
 struct device_node *of_chosen;
 
@@ -159,7 +157,7 @@ static int __init early_init_dt_scan_memory(unsigned long 
node,
                                const char *uname, int depth, void *data)
 {
        char *type = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "device_type", NULL);
-       cell_t *reg, *endp;
+       u32 *reg, *endp;
        unsigned long l;
 
        /* Look for the ibm,dynamic-reconfiguration-memory node */
@@ -178,13 +176,13 @@ static int __init early_init_dt_scan_memory(unsigned long 
node,
        } else if (strcmp(type, "memory") != 0)
                return 0;
 
-       reg = (cell_t *)of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "linux,usable-memory", &l);
+       reg = (u32 *)of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "linux,usable-memory", &l);
        if (reg == NULL)
-               reg = (cell_t *)of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "reg", &l);
+               reg = (u32 *)of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "reg", &l);
        if (reg == NULL)
                return 0;
 
-       endp = reg + (l / sizeof(cell_t));
+       endp = reg + (l / sizeof(u32));
 
        pr_debug("memory scan node %s, reg size %ld, data: %x %x %x %x,\n",
                uname, l, reg[0], reg[1], reg[2], reg[3]);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
index 048e3a3..43cdba2 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
@@ -67,8 +67,6 @@ int __initdata iommu_force_on;
 unsigned long tce_alloc_start, tce_alloc_end;
 #endif
 
-typedef u32 cell_t;
-
 extern rwlock_t devtree_lock;  /* temporary while merging */
 
 /* export that to outside world */
@@ -441,22 +439,22 @@ static int __init early_init_dt_scan_chosen(unsigned long 
node,
  */
 static int __init early_init_dt_scan_drconf_memory(unsigned long node)
 {
-       cell_t *dm, *ls, *usm;
+       u32 *dm, *ls, *usm;
        unsigned long l, n, flags;
        u64 base, size, lmb_size;
        unsigned int is_kexec_kdump = 0, rngs;
 
        ls = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "ibm,lmb-size", &l);
-       if (ls == NULL || l < dt_root_size_cells * sizeof(cell_t))
+       if (ls == NULL || l < dt_root_size_cells * sizeof(u32))
                return 0;
        lmb_size = dt_mem_next_cell(dt_root_size_cells, &ls);
 
        dm = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "ibm,dynamic-memory", &l);
-       if (dm == NULL || l < sizeof(cell_t))
+       if (dm == NULL || l < sizeof(u32))
                return 0;
 
        n = *dm++;      /* number of entries */
-       if (l < (n * (dt_root_addr_cells + 4) + 1) * sizeof(cell_t))
+       if (l < (n * (dt_root_addr_cells + 4) + 1) * sizeof(u32))
                return 0;
 
        /* check if this is a kexec/kdump kernel. */
@@ -515,7 +513,7 @@ static int __init early_init_dt_scan_memory(unsigned long 
node,
                                            const char *uname, int depth, void 
*data)
 {
        char *type = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "device_type", NULL);
-       cell_t *reg, *endp;
+       u32 *reg, *endp;
        unsigned long l;
 
        /* Look for the ibm,dynamic-reconfiguration-memory node */
@@ -540,7 +538,7 @@ static int __init early_init_dt_scan_memory(unsigned long 
node,
        if (reg == NULL)
                return 0;
 
-       endp = reg + (l / sizeof(cell_t));
+       endp = reg + (l / sizeof(u32));
 
        DBG("memory scan node %s, reg size %ld, data: %x %x %x %x,\n",
            uname, l, reg[0], reg[1], reg[2], reg[3]);

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to