Avi Kivity wrote: > On 11/26/2009 02:46 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: >> >>> Please avoid unnamed unions in user-visible headers - they're a gcc >>> extension. >>> >>> Yes, we have them elsewhere, but let's not add to the pile. >>> >> I'm open to scalable suggestions that don't break existing userspace >> code. >> If I name the union now, existing qemu code will break. If I align the >> pad array manually I'll definitely mess up something. >> > > You can keep pvr out of the (named) union.
So we'd have sregs.padded.ppc64.slb? I don't see how that is an improvement. Alex _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
