> From: Wood Scott-B07421 > Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 11:09 PM > > Cache-sram does not have any device tree entry since it is not a > > hardware as such. Putting it under chosen can be another option. > > I think, Scott (cc'ed) was of the opinion that since 32b > base address > > support is missing; so there is no point in moving this > address to the > > command line and .config should be okay for now for it. > > I don't know what you mean by "32b base address support is > missing". I have no objection to putting it on the command line.
It was a typo, it should be missing 36b address support. Since the kernel did not run under different environment (i.e 32b / 36b base address); so it was decided that .config may be okay for this. > > -Scott > Thanks, Vivek _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev