Hi Mahesh ! > +/** > + * regs_within_kernel_stack() - check the address in the stack > + * @regs: pt_regs which contains kernel stack pointer. > + * @addr: address which is checked. > + * > + * regs_within_kernel_stack() checks @addr is within the kernel stack > page(s). > + * If @addr is within the kernel stack, it returns true. If not, returns > false. > + */ > + > +static inline bool regs_within_kernel_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, > + unsigned long addr) > +{ > + return ((addr & ~(THREAD_SIZE - 1)) == > + (kernel_stack_pointer(regs) & ~(THREAD_SIZE - 1))); > +}
Out of curiosity, what is the above meant for ? I'm trying to understand because it will not work with such things as interrupt or softirq stack... > +/** > + * regs_get_kernel_stack_nth() - get Nth entry of the stack > + * @regs: pt_regs which contains kernel stack pointer. > + * @n: stack entry number. > + * > + * regs_get_kernel_stack_nth() returns @n th entry of the kernel stack which > + * is specified by @regs. If the @n th entry is NOT in the kernel stack, > + * this returns 0. > + */ > +static inline unsigned long regs_get_kernel_stack_nth(struct pt_regs *regs, > + unsigned int n) > +{ > + unsigned long *addr = (unsigned long *)kernel_stack_pointer(regs); > + addr += n; > + if (regs_within_kernel_stack(regs, (unsigned long)addr)) > + return *addr; > + else > + return 0; > +} Is this meant to fetch stack based arguments or do backtraces or similar or does this have a different purpose ? > /* > * These are defined as per linux/ptrace.h, which see. > */ > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c > index ef14988..e816aba 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c > @@ -39,6 +39,108 @@ > #include <asm/system.h> > > /* > + * The parameter save area on the stack is used to store arguments being > passed > + * to callee function and is located at fixed offset from stack pointer. > + */ > +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC32 > +#define PARAMETER_SAVE_AREA_OFFSET 24 /* bytes */ > +#else /* CONFIG_PPC32 */ > +#define PARAMETER_SAVE_AREA_OFFSET 48 /* bytes */ > +#endif > + > +struct pt_regs_offset { > + const char *name; > + int offset; > +}; > + > +#define REG_OFFSET_NAME(r) {.name = #r, .offset = offsetof(struct pt_regs, > r)} > +#define REG_OFFSET_END {.name = NULL, .offset = 0} > + > +static const struct pt_regs_offset regoffset_table[] = { > + REG_OFFSET_NAME(gpr[0]), > + REG_OFFSET_NAME(gpr[1]), > + REG_OFFSET_NAME(gpr[2]), > + REG_OFFSET_NAME(gpr[3]), > + REG_OFFSET_NAME(gpr[4]), > + REG_OFFSET_NAME(gpr[5]), > + REG_OFFSET_NAME(gpr[6]), > + REG_OFFSET_NAME(gpr[7]), > + REG_OFFSET_NAME(gpr[8]), > + REG_OFFSET_NAME(gpr[9]), > + REG_OFFSET_NAME(gpr[10]), > + REG_OFFSET_NAME(gpr[11]), > + REG_OFFSET_NAME(gpr[12]), > + REG_OFFSET_NAME(gpr[13]), > + REG_OFFSET_NAME(gpr[14]), > + REG_OFFSET_NAME(gpr[15]), > + REG_OFFSET_NAME(gpr[16]), > + REG_OFFSET_NAME(gpr[17]), > + REG_OFFSET_NAME(gpr[18]), > + REG_OFFSET_NAME(gpr[19]), > + REG_OFFSET_NAME(gpr[20]), > + REG_OFFSET_NAME(gpr[21]), > + REG_OFFSET_NAME(gpr[22]), > + REG_OFFSET_NAME(gpr[23]), > + REG_OFFSET_NAME(gpr[24]), > + REG_OFFSET_NAME(gpr[25]), > + REG_OFFSET_NAME(gpr[26]), > + REG_OFFSET_NAME(gpr[27]), > + REG_OFFSET_NAME(gpr[28]), > + REG_OFFSET_NAME(gpr[29]), > + REG_OFFSET_NAME(gpr[30]), > + REG_OFFSET_NAME(gpr[31]), I find it weird that you have the [ an ] in the name ... We usually name these guys gpr0...gpr31 or even r0...r31. Is that name user visible ? Maybe you should use a different macro GPR_OFFSET_NAME(num) that generates both gpr[num] for the offsetof and r##num for the register name. > + REG_OFFSET_NAME(nip), > + REG_OFFSET_NAME(msr), > + REG_OFFSET_NAME(orig_gpr3), > + REG_OFFSET_NAME(ctr), > + REG_OFFSET_NAME(link), > + REG_OFFSET_NAME(xer), > + REG_OFFSET_NAME(ccr), > +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64 > + REG_OFFSET_NAME(softe), > +#else > + REG_OFFSET_NAME(mq), > +#endif > + REG_OFFSET_NAME(trap), > + REG_OFFSET_NAME(dar), > + REG_OFFSET_NAME(dsisr), > + REG_OFFSET_NAME(result), > + REG_OFFSET_END, > +}; Do you need to expose orig_gpr3 and result there ? Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev