Alexandre Bounine wrote:
@@ -369,6 +380,10 @@ static struct rio_dev __devinit *rio_set rdev->rswitch->switchid); rio_route_set_ops(rdev);+ if (do_enum && rdev->rswitch->clr_table)+ rdev->rswitch->clr_table(port, destid, hopcount, + RIO_GLOBAL_TABLE); + list_add_tail(&rswitch->node, &rio_switches);} else
Why clear the tables here, why not in rio_enum_peer?
+DECLARE_RIO_ROUTE_OPS(RIO_VID_TUNDRA, RIO_DID_TSI572, tsi57x_route_add_entry, tsi57x_route_get_entry, tsi57x_route_clr_table); +DECLARE_RIO_ROUTE_OPS(RIO_VID_TUNDRA, RIO_DID_TSI574, tsi57x_route_add_entry, tsi57x_route_get_entry, tsi57x_route_clr_table); +DECLARE_RIO_ROUTE_OPS(RIO_VID_TUNDRA, RIO_DID_TSI577, tsi57x_route_add_entry, tsi57x_route_get_entry, tsi57x_route_clr_table); +DECLARE_RIO_ROUTE_OPS(RIO_VID_TUNDRA, RIO_DID_TSI578, tsi57x_route_add_entry, tsi57x_route_get_entry, tsi57x_route_clr_table);
Can the 568 and 578 driver be shared? Have a 5xx driver? Micha _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
