FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> If we want to make swiotlb generic (make on any architectures), we
> need to handle more cache issues here, I think. So it's better to have
> more generic ways instead of adding hooks to some archs.
>
Ok. So what would be an acceptable way of handling this in a generic way?
Should we for example have 2 levels of DMA ops in the swiotlb case (swiotlb and
"actual") and call the 2nd level ("actual") from the swiotlb code whenever we
need to act on non-bounced buffers?
Any other ideas?
Thanks,
Albert
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
