On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 12:08 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote: > > - ISYNC_ON_SMP > > + PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER > > I wonder if this shouldn't be called PPC_ISYNC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER ? > > Unlike PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER, it is not an acquire barrier unless it > is used like an isync.
Right. The semantic of isync would be more something like PPC_IFETCH_BARRIER or similar :-) Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
