On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 12:30 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> NOPs within the property section are skipped, but NOPs between
> OF_DT_END_NODE and OF_DT_BEGIN_NODE were not. My firmware NOPs out
> entire nodes depending on various environment parameters.
>
> of_scan_flat_dt already handles NOP more generally..
Good catch, though that code has now moved over to drivers/of
and is a bit different. Grant is going to fix it up though.
Cheers,
Ben.
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
> index 4ec3008..92137b2 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
> @@ -408,8 +408,11 @@ static unsigned long __init unflatten_dt_node(unsigned
> long mem,
> if (!np->type)
> np->type = "<NULL>";
> }
> - while (tag == OF_DT_BEGIN_NODE) {
> - mem = unflatten_dt_node(mem, p, np, allnextpp, fpsize);
> + while (tag == OF_DT_BEGIN_NODE || tag == OF_DT_NOP) {
> + if (tag == OF_DT_NOP)
> + *p += 4;
> + else
> + mem = unflatten_dt_node(mem, p, np, allnextpp, fpsize);
> tag = *((u32 *)(*p));
> }
> if (tag != OF_DT_END_NODE) {
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
